This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mandaara was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 9 August 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Bhaagamathie. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
Not done: as you have not requested a change. Please request your change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ". Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 14:31, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Editor 2050:, In this edit I reverted some content you changed in this edit. You assert that "The film received positive reviews upon release from critics" but that's not supported by this reference. The reference seems focused on what regular viewers think, not critics. Additionally, you changed the language to suggest that the overall response was positive, but the source asserts that these are initial responses. This is why the content previously was phrased "opened to positive audience response". Opening responses may skew more positive than responses over time. If a source wants to clarify that critical response was positive over time, they are welcome to do so, but we don't yet have that statement properly supported. Thanks and regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:46, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Can anybody confirm what Sushil Choudhary's participation was in this film? In this source, Anushka Shetty apparently calls him out by name. "There's something for everyone in Bhaagamathie. There's suspense, romance, horror and light-hearted moments. Cinematographers (R Madhi and Sushil Choudhary) have done an exceptional job". This content keeps getting removed, like here by @Mastanineil: yet nobody's bothered to explain in detail why the reference is incorrect. For our purposes, we care about the principal cinematographer(s), not second unit or anything like that. So if that's the issue, let's clarify that, please, preferably by checking the actual film's credit roll. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:41, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]