Talk:Bhatnagar

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthroponymy Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please, before adding people non existing on Wikipedia to this list, prove their notability here.

Thanks and Happy Editing by Snowolf^(talk)_CON^COI on 15:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can I recommend re-adding Sir Rajeshwar (Roger) Bhatnagar on the grounds that a) he received a knighthood from the New Zealand government, which proves some social prominence, and b) is on the New Zealand Rich list for his success in business, c) has received some prominence over his connections to the arts and also for collection of cars. Arguably his awarding of a knighthood would make him more prominent than other Bhatnagars on the list such as the computer game designer or scientist.

http://www.dpmc.govt.nz/honours/lists/nzom.html (link to knighthood on New Zealand government website) http://www.library.auckland.ac.nz/subjects/bus/tutorials/newztut/newsgetall.htm (link to proof of NZ Rich list membership, cars and art links)

125.238.1.1 (talk) 20:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]