From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

WikiProject India (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Statement mentioned below is just illogical and must be scraped soon.

Genetic profile of Bhumihar brahmins[edit]

As the research published in Annals of Human Biology, National Center for Biotechnology Information ( US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health ) on Sep-Oct 2003. Which was done on "Genetic profile based upon 15 microsatellites of four caste groups of the eastern Indian state". It was found that the DNA genetic profile of bhumihar clustering with the Brahmin group. As expected, since Bhumihar is known to be a subclass of Brahmin.

Reference :

Traditional proof of Bhumihar brahmins[edit]

"Mool" The way to learn "Veda" (The ancient literature of Hinduism) is one of the keys to distinguish between brahmins of different origin and "Gotra" the followers of the ancient scholar "Rishi". There is no disparity between bhumihar brahmins and any other brahmins of northern states of India.

As Wikipedia is not a verified and authentic encyclopedia. so here anyone can write anything junk without proof and ignoring factual evidence. I understand the frustration of some Society, Who are jealous and quotes irrelevant information about bhumihar brahmins. From Genetic to Spiritual and traditional there are no proofs against bhumihar. So please change the word "claim to be brahmin" to a "sub-caste of brahmin".

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 October 2017[edit]

Other legends state that they are the offspring of a union between Rajput men and Brahmin women, if this right that what about those people who tell their gotra as bharadwaj as the wife of rishi bharadwaj was a rajput princes and the saint bharadwaj was brahmin then there child should be of mix breed but there children claim to be either a pure brahmin or a pure how is this possible. are't they contradicting themself. My point is if bhumihar are told to be of mix breed then all the rajput and brahmins having their gotra as bharadwaj must be of mix breed.Is it not a logic with facts. Rajanand1996 (talk) 19:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:30, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

This change should not be made as within Bhumihars, different Clans have got different lineage, legends and history.

I really hate this type of Wikipedia nonsense , first of all this is fake , and trying to defame the society status of powerful Brahmin ( Bhumihar ) , Britisher also played ( Divide n rule ) , nowadays Politician doing it , just for vote bank . Second , you make a list , nowadays other Brahmin subcaste marrying with rajput , etc etc ..... Like divyanka tripathi , rohit Sharma , ishant Sharma , rani mukherjee , kajol mukherjee , etc etc ...... So many people's at the local level also doing that , and still they are pure , this is disgusting ,......... If your thinking like this , then this is not your place , because nowadays Whole caste mixed with other caste ...every body know very well stop doing non sense things , Singh , Thakur , Roy is manmade title , to show the powerful status , not caste , illiterate people are very dangerous Pandit3333 (talk) 07:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC) Pandit3333 (talk) 07:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Customs and Tradition edit request[edit]

The article says "Some Bhumihars in Muzaffarpur trace their lineage to Husseini Brahmins". This statement sounds wrong,it should instead be "Husseini Muslims in Muzaffarpur trace their lineage to Bhumihar Brahmins." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rai1112 (talkcontribs)

Not done The reference says "a group of Hindus participated in the Muharram procession with equal veneration [...] They claim their lineage to Hussaini Brahmin sect [...] Mostly Bhumihars, the group marched...". utcursch | talk 16:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Shut up this nonsense . What's going on , saraswat Brahmin ( husseni Brahmin ) can you relate to Bhumihar Brahmin . Go to hell Pandit3333 (talk) 08:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC) Pandit3333 (talk) 08:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

What do you think , whatever you are writing , we will accept it , bloody nonsense , you will decide who I am , get lost Pandit3333 (talk) 08:07, 14 October 2017 (UTC) Pandit3333 (talk) 08:07, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

See WP:VNT. - Sitush (talk) 09:16, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

The history of Bhumihars is much older than Hussain or Islam. So it doesn't sound logical to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:c284:59c7::2b1e:38a0 (talk) 13:11, October 16, 2017‎

If you can provide a reliable source that substantiates that claim, then it can be added to the article. We don't just take each other's word that something is true. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)