Talk:Big Brother Australia 2006 nominations table

The Big Brother WikiProject aims to improve articles relating to Big Brother, and Big Brother Australia 2006 nominations table has been identified as one of these articles. Anybody can help the WikiProject by trying to improve existing articles. Please add your name to the list of participants, if you are committed to helping out.Big BrotherWikipedia:WikiProject Big BrotherTemplate:WikiProject Big BrotherBig Brother articles

Australia: Television

	Australia portal Big Brother Australia 2006 nominations table is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Australian television.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Sorry, ive set this table up under the assumption it will run for 16 weeks, the duration of the series is still uncertain. --NicShix 19:48, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Colours and formatting[edit]

To follow suit with previous nominations tables, the following colour codes should be used:

Banned: #959FFD
Removed: #FFCCCC
Evicted: #FA8072
Exempt: #FBF373
Finalists: #FBF373
In Revenge Room: #DDDDDD
No nominations: #CCCCCC
Not in house: #FFFFFF
Walked: #FFCCFF

The Table[edit]

It's not really necessary; but if people want it to stay there, something could at least be done about the colours - they are too bright. Also, the number of nomination points each housemate received during nominations isn't included. --JD^talk_email 20:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest the colour scheme used for the UK pages. -- 9 cds^(talk) 22:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Highly unnecessary. --JD[^talk|_email] 09:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why? -- 9 cds^(talk) 13:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I made the red lighter if thats any help and i shortened it to 14 weeks as it is estimated to finish at the end of July. I included the amount of nominations points because i was following Big Brother 6 nominations table the BBUK6 one and added a bit more. I thought the table of how many times housemates have been nominated might be helpful. :) --NicShix 11:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've tidied it up a bit more... changed the colours to the BB7 UK one (more readable, and less red), and I've inserted a few line breaks. If anyone doesn't like it, I'd prefer if you explained on here so we can chat about it, rather than edit war. -- 9 cds^(talk) 11:24, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Against Public Vote/Evicted[edit]

Please can someone add the rest of those who were against the public vote. For example, the week Ashley and John got kicked out, Gaelan got evicted. He's not in the table for against public vote. I live in the UK, so don't know which other columns are also wrong... Thanks ellisjm 11:34, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley and John[edit]

Why does the table say Ashley and John were evicted? They were not evicted. --JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 17:39, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Evictees[edit]

The order of housemates up for eviction shouldn't be in alphabetical order; it should be in the order of highest to lowest number of points. --JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 17:41, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Columns[edit]

I think the table's going to need three more columns - one for Wednesday, one for Sunday, and one for whenever the final is. --JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 10:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was just about to tell everyone this. Ive done it, if anyone has any objections, feel free to alter it. Should we just have Week 14 (1), Week 14 (2) or should we have Week 14 plus the day, or just the day.

Im abit puzzled as to how we will fill in the other tables for those who survive Wednesday's eviction as there will no longer be any nominations as today was the last round. I guess we could fill it with "No Nominations" but that sounds a bit stupid considering its the last week. --Felixia 12:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe fill the boxes with Final Week? --JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 12:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good solution. --Felixia 12:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Day numbers[edit]

Can Day numbers be put in the top row, under the Week numbers? —JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 10:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Week 1[edit]

Should Week 1 not say who the housemates nominated? I mean, even though they didn't nominate to evict somebody, that's what they thought they were doing; and they were still nominations to evict somebody from the house. --JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 12:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it should. Just do it... godgoddingham333 10:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I knew who nominated who, I'd have done it ages ago... I'm looking around on the internet for some information on who nominated who, but I haven't found any yet. —JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 10:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren on the bottom two table things[edit]

Should Lauren really be on those bottom tables? Technically, she was never a housemate - she entered as an Intruder, and left as one. —JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 11:55, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but if she's in the main table, she should be in the other tables... —Preceding unsigned comment added by godgoddingham333 (talk • contribs)

The bigger table doesn't even have a box to say she was ever in the house; but I see your point. —JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 12:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Katie in week 1[edit]

How come Katie only made one nomination?--SimonPeter 20:59, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was it because she spent too long making her nomination and she didn't have time to make her second nomination. Or was it because she passed or failed a task and that's why she could only make one nomination. Or is it because nobody knows who else she nominated.--195.93.21.138 12:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You saying that's just made me think of something. Does the Total Nomination Points received table have nominations points that Big Brother gave to housemates? _{talk to} JD ^{wants e-mail} 12:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How do u mean?--SimonPeter 12:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Big Brother gives housemates a nomination point if they spend more than two minutes on their two nominations, or if they don't nominate properly. I can't see any of these nominations on the big table. _{talk to} JD ^{wants e-mail} 12:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe that fact isn't true. We would have to ask someone from Australia?--SimonPeter 12:58, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What fact? _{talk to} JD ^{wants e-mail} 13:00, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that Big Brother gives them a point if they spend more than 2 minutes nominating.--SimonPeter 13:03, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing incorrect about that. Nominations were live in Big Brother 2006, so housemates were given two minutes to make two nominations. If they didn't give a good reason for nominating a housemate, or if their nominations took longer than two minutes, they would be given a nomination point from Big Brother. _{talk to} JD ^{wants e-mail} 13:06, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is that why Katie only made one nomination, cause she ran out of time?--SimonPeter 13:08, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know; I only brought this up because what you said made me realise this. It's possible, as if a housemate spends more than two minutes nominating, they get told to leave the Diary Room. _{talk to} JD ^{wants e-mail} 13:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]