Talk:Big Ears

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Title reverted[edit]

I reverted the undiscussed controversial move of this article from Big Ears to Big Ears (film) so it's back at the original title, Big Ears. NOTE: any move from an base name unblemished by disambiguation to a disambiguated name when the base name remains a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to the article, because there is no justification to have the base anme redirect elsewhere nor to have a dab page, is inherently controversial as unnecessary disambiguation. --В²C ☎ 00:35, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's disruptive. You've moved an article getting 11 out of 67 daily views to default baseline position for what? Evidently either a dab is needed or Big Ears from Noddy would be on the baseline. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was just reverting per BRD an undiscussed move that was obviously controversial. If the character rather than the film is the primary topic then the titles should be adjusted accordingly... after an RM discussion. But since this is a two dabs situation I'm good with either being at the basename as being no worse for users than a dab page being at the base name, and often better. --В²C ☎ 20:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A film getting 11 out of 67 daily views having (film) after it is not "obviously controversial", neither is it "a two dabs situation", see Big ears. I suggest that you please restore (film) to the title. Thank you. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:02, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]