Jump to content

Talk:Blanchard's cricket frog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ashkupka. Peer reviewers: MaM4213, Wciupa, Donsaul70.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rename?

[edit]

Debate has been going on in the scientific world as to whether or not this phylogenetic group should be considered a species in its own. Not only does the article not mention this, but recent genetic findings now make biologists tend on the separate species side. The French wikipedia has it named Acris blanchardi. To the extent of my knowledge, I think it should be right to rename this page Acris blanchardi and if for whatever reason it shouldn't be so, at least have an inter-wiki consensus of some sort on the name of this group (i.e. make the French wikipedia adopt Acris crepitans blanchardi). It will be quite the awkward thing on Wikidata if some languages adopt the species status and others only the subspecies'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicolas M. Perrault (talkcontribs) 04:05, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is actually fairly common for articles on different language Wikipedias to have different names. Can you point to some sources for this scientific debate? Dana boomer (talk) 12:09, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blanchard's cricket frog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution

[edit]

I added information to the introduction as well as the conservation and description sections of this article. I also added four new sources to improve the reliability and strength of the article. Other things that I added were wiki-links throughout, I hope that all of these new additions can improve the understanding of Blanchard's cricket frog. If you have any questions about my contributions please let me know. Ashkupka (talk) 01:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

[edit]

Fixed a spelling error and added more wikilinks.MaM4213 (talk) 13:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Southwestern Ohio

[edit]

I was cleaning out a Flower Bed and found one. I had no idea they were endangered. Yittle64 (talk) 09:49, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They are only endangered in some northern states and areas of their range. They are still very common in the south. WiLaFa (talk) 05:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]