This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
I understand why materials affiliated with the subject matter aren't reliable due to possible biases in favor of the subject matter, however, the best information on how to play the game would come from the game itself. Therefore I think the tag saying it needs third party resources isn't necessary. If however, I were to make the claim that in Korea, Blue Marble Game is more popular than Monopoly, then naturally that would need to come from a third party source.Bethereds (talk) 19:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's not just about bias, it's about verifiability - we need reliable sources to confirm that the game is significant enough to be worth writing about in Wikipedia (if it hasn't yet received a single shred of press or academic attention, it's not yet time to write it up in an encyclopaedia), and to confirm that it exists at all (if the only given reference for a game is its own ruleset, the article could be a hoax!). --McGeddon (talk) 20:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There is plenty of press about it in Korean, but very little in English. That's part of the reason why I made this articleBethereds (talk) 02:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
