This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Pfold The witty references, without actual article title and with two urls that go nowhere now, would be useful if you could find them again. Even more useful if you might write a Reviews section for the article. However, if you find and insert a useful url for the two that go nowhere now, I will write a Review section, and add Kirkus Reviews and Publishers Weekly to the mix. I have trouble getting into archives of UK newspapers generally, and of the four, I could read only the two published by The Guardian. I have done my best to make them conventional citations in a section now title Reviews cited, where the title= the title of the newspaper article, and the author's name is indicate by first= and last=. Thanks for any help you can provide! --Prairieplant (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Prairieplant, The Times is now behind a paywall, so it'll need a subscriber to fix the link. The Scotsman review seems to have disappeared completely, I'm afraid, so will need to go. But good work fixing the citation formatting! --Pfold (talk) 18:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]