Talk:Boeing 737/GA3

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SounderBruce (talk · contribs) 23:55, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing later. At first glance, there are quite a few unsourced paragraphs that need to be resolved. Bredyhopi, have you consulted with other major contributors to the article before going through with the nomination? Sounder Bruce 23:55, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's been reviewed twice before, but the banners were hidden. I have un-hidden them for now. GA-RT-22 (talk) 02:06, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Failed "good article" nomination

This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of April 13, 2021, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: The article hasn't been rewritten in a cohesive manner, leading to a jumble of different styles that range from casual to over-technical.

2. Verifiable?: Many paragraphs lack citations, and many need to have better-quality sources used instead of blogs and airline press releases.

3. Broad in coverage?: Compared to other Boeing jetliner articles, the Development section is quite short. The use of a list for the "Major design developments" seems to only serve as filler, rather than a useful overview.

4. Neutral point of view?: Did not evaluate here.

5. Stable?:

Pass

6. Images?: Generally fine, but the galleries should be cleaned up.

It's clear that this was a drive-by nomination and the article needs a lot of work to meet GA standards.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Sounder Bruce 04:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]