Talk:2009 Bolivian general election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Bolivia Mid‑importance

	Bolivia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bolivia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all Bolivia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoliviaWikipedia:WikiProject BoliviaTemplate:WikiProject BoliviaBolivia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Final results are out now[edit]

Final results are out now. MAS won with 64.22% 26 senators and 88 deputies, reaching two-thirds majority in both chambers. Reyes of PPB-Convergencia obtained 26.46%, 10 senators and 37 deputies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.246.207.170 (talk) 17:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Election of Senate[edit]

Can someone explain to me how the Bolivian Senate is elected? The TSE website gives two sets of voting figures, one for the Presidency and one for the Chamber of Deputies. Is one of these used to elected the Senators? Also, the proportionality of the Senate election seems irregular. In Chuquisaca, for example, the MAS won all four Senate seats, but the PPB polled 33% of the vote both in the Presidential and Congressional figures. On any proportional system that should have gained the PPB one seat. Can anyone explain this? Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 04:35, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PPB holds one Chuquisaca seat, see Current members of the Bolivian Plurinational Legislative Assembly#Senate.--Carwil (talk) 15:29, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right, I misread the TSE website. But I still don't know which set of figures the Senate is elected from. Do you know? Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 05:07, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bolivian general election, 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110428105059/http://www.autonomia.gob.bo/portal3/content/regi%C3%B3n-aut%C3%B3noma-chaco-tarije%C3%B1o to http://www.autonomia.gob.bo/portal3/content/regi%C3%B3n-aut%C3%B3noma-chaco-tarije%C3%B1o

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:28, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]