Jump to content

Talk:Bonded by Blood (band)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:49, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    In the Style, influences and reception section, "Exodus' lead guitarist Gary Holt says that's a compliment" ---> "Exodus' lead guitarist Gary Holt says that is a compliment", per here.
    Done.
    Check.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    Throughout the article, there needs to be a consistency between "mid 2005" and "mid-2005". In the Style, influences and reception section, why is "everything" italicized?
    Done. See emphasis.--Cannibaloki 18:38, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Check.
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    Are free images available of the band?
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Not that much to do. If the above can be dealt with, I will pass the article. Good luck!

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:49, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to Cannibaloki for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:18, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks!--Cannibaloki 19:23, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]