Talk:Bowie knife

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bowie knife article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 180 days

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Blades (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blades, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BladesWikipedia:WikiProject BladesTemplate:WikiProject BladesBlades articles

Meteorite?

I had an authority that Black's first knife for Bowie was made of a nickel-iron meteorite (the best steel then available) that he'd found.184.99.159.217 (talk) 21:38, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What's your source, I've read that as well.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 23:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bowie knife. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110813225845/http://leg1.state.va.us/000/cod/18.2-308.HTM to http://leg1.state.va.us/000/cod/18.2-308.HTM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Texas Citation

I noticed that the note close to the bottom of the article had no reference article or citation. I will gladly look for one, but I wanted to mention it here in case I don't get around to it. zfJames (talk) 16:32, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quillion

Hi, the description links to a "handguard" article, which is about handguards on guns. On that page there is a link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossguard, about bladed weapons. Maybe make the use of terminology more consistent? T 84.208.86.134 (talk) 09:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

False Edge

I have spent a good bit of time researching this because I am a knifemaker and want to be precise and correct in my terminology. This is my best understanding of where the term "false edge" comes from:
A double bladed knife or sword has two true edges meaning they are sharpened the entire length (or nearly the entire length) of the blade on both sides. If only one side is sharpened the entire length it is a single edged knife or sword with only one true edge. If part of the blade opposite the true edge is sharpened, then that side of the blade is a "false edge." That term includes not only the sharpened part near the tip, but also the unsharpened part, which is called the "spine."
A single bladed knife or sword with a false edge can cut both ways near the tip. If it doesn't have a false edge it can only cut one way.
If there is a beveled section near the tip of a knife opposite the true edge, that is called a "swedge." Whether or not a swedge can be sharpened and still be called a swedge is a matter of much debate. Most knifemakers use "swedge" to mean an unsharpened bevel.
A considerable amount of confusion arises from the fact that if a swedge cannot be sharpened and still called a swedge, then there is no agreed upon name for the sharpened part of a false edge. I suppose the simplest solution would be to say that a swedge can be sharpened, and then define a "false edge" as having a sharpened swedge.
Good luck trying to find an authoritative source that definitively settles all of this. I've tried to no avail...DrHenley (talk) 16:25, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]