Talk:Brazilian Academy of Sciences

Brazil: Education and science Mid‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Education and Science in Brazil task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

We don't need a list of every member... Can someone trim it down to the most notable members, or something? Or remove it entirely? I don't know who's notable and who isn't, although a short list of members might be nice. I just don't know. Grand master ka 17:40, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of course someone can, and I did, using the very simple criterion of the ones who had articles in WP, plus a few I knew of who soon will. But the members of all national academies are notable, and the ones of the US academies are all listed in a WP list. Of course, all of them have working WP links, but that is primarily because of the ethnocentrism of the en WP. The complete list is still in the history, which is fortunate because I could not find it on the academy site--just a search box--and it would be worthwhile inserting all those with pages in the Portuguese WP, together with the interwiki links. At that point, the list should become a separate list article, as with the other academies.

Nominating this for deletion was perhaps not an ideal way of going about things, but it did fortunately call it to my attention, as I happen to be one of the few people who regular check the proposed deletions (prods) and this one certainly stood out. So all's well.

The articles still needs expansion in other respects, and I tagged it.

DGG 01:38, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabetization

List of members should be alphabetized by last name, rather than by first as it is now. --Pete Tillman (talk) 08:08, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]