Talk:Breck's

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Article was too promotional. Edits have been made to neutralize advertisement-like content. Breck's is historically significant; article has been edited to focus on historically relevant content. OwlCupAwesome (talk) 14:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Bulb Importing section is still way to promotional. Especially the last sentance that says they hold on "exclusive" supply of 4 different types of bulbs. The first sentance is also slightly promotional.--TParis00ap (talk) 17:42, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about the last sentence talking about exclusives. I went ahead and removed it - doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article. I think the bulb importing section is relevant, however, as it explains the company's current field of operations. I disagree about the the first sentence/paragraph. I don't see anything in that paragraph that is not backed up by a reference. The article's claim about Breck's being the largest U.S. bulb importer is not unsubstantiated, and it is a relevant/historically significant fact. OwlCupAwesome (talk) 13:05, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By first sentance I meant the first sentance of the Bulb importing section. Since you removed the whole section, it looks good to me.--TParis00ap (talk) 23:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Breck's. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CEO of Breck Flowers

Who is the CEO of Breck's flowers How do u talk with them personality. I am very displeased in a letter I wrote to Breck and the action they took and never replied to me. And the flowers that I got died or was dead when I recv'd then. Thanks Robbie Brand — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:302:D11A:42F0:B0CC:CA04:8C14:CCD9 (talk) 20:59, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]