Talk:Bridgeport (machine tool brand)

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Metalworking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Worthy of keeping (notable)

The article's existence is under challenge for notability. There is a problem in that I know that the Bridgeport brand is very notable (within the machining industry) and that people on the shop floor often call even the clones "Bridgeports" (just like a Band-Aid clone is called a Band-Aid); but I have no refs at hand to prove it. And have no practical way to find one. I don't think it's even possible to search the industry's literature—AFAIK there are no indexing and abstracting services for this industry's journals. And even if one exists, I wouldn't have access to it. It is the old WP problem of knowing the common knowledge within a field but not being able to cite a ref to prove it. — ¾-10 13:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The template proposal said, "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason." I removed, per the explanation above. Respectfully, — ¾-10 13:47, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I too have heard many people refer to all Bridgeport-type machines as "bridgeports". I'm going to attempt to clean up the wording a bit, since it seems a very convoluted way to make a simple point: people use "bridgeport" the same way they use "band-aid" or "coke".

If you like I can send you a photograph of a bank of 3 bridgeport milling machines at my work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oliver at 81.158.153.1 (talk) 15:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Oliver. It would be great if you can contribute the photo. The best way to do it is to go to this page and upload your file. I know that page contains a lot of info, but really if you just enter the most basic info and make sure to select a license (the one marked "(recommended)" is fine), you can ignore 90% of it if you want to. If you end up uploading it, let me know here, and I'll put the photo in this article. Or you can do that yourself. The syntax is not too hard, just insert [[File:FILENAME|thumb|Caption]] (where FILENAME=whatever you named it) and it'll show up. Whatever level of editing you care to do is great, or if not, I'll go from there. Thanks! — ¾-10 22:04, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

9/18/23- InCompass of Minneapolis MN announced it's acquisition of the Bridgeport Brand. 70.61.169.18 (talk) 00:09, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bridgeport (machine tool brand). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110217043720/http://www.todaysmachiningworld.com/celebrating-america%E2%80%99s-love-affair-with-machining/ to http://www.todaysmachiningworld.com/celebrating-america%E2%80%99s-love-affair-with-machining/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]