Talk:Britannic (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the War films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Factual errors

It hardly seems appropriate to have historical errors listed for a film that's almost completely fictional. Fionnlaoch (talk) 20:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe not, but considering that the film markets itself as being based on true events, I think they serve their purpose here. Plus the fact that there are sections dedicated to the historical inaccuracies on nearly all of the film and TV adaptations of the Titanic, so why should her sister ship be treated any different? 82.36.28.41 (talk) 15:00, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. For example, a dreadnought named HMS Victoria was used probably to avoid factual errors with real-life ships... either way, it's trivia and unsourced. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 03:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claims

"Under the articles of war, Reynolds considers his actions against the Britannic to be legal (any attack on a hospital ship in wartime is considered to be a war crime) "

Well laying mines is legal and if a hospital ship runs into one, too bad. Directly torpedoing one would be a different question.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Britannic (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061116005823/http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1800416667/info to http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1800416667/info

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

poor writing

"as" is used way too much; poor grammar. 100.15.127.199 (talk) 23:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOFIXIT. DonIago (talk) 01:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]