Talk:British qualified accountants

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

Royal Charter

How is the ICAEW the largest European accountancy body with Royal Charter when the ACCA is British based, larger, and also has Royal Charter? And why is it important to have Royal Charter - most countries don't even have monarchies any more! Matthew 20:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and I am taking out the 'world records with Royal Charter' since there isnt much compettion. Abtract 23:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the United Kingdom a Royal Charter signifies that a professional body is recognised by the academic and professional community. Psnae 03:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited claims

I have remove the uncited claims about biggest and best at the beginning of the article. If anyone can include citations then of course they can be put back in but they look too much like trumpet blowing for an encyclopedia. Abtract 06:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

unclear

I am totally unclear about the relationship between these different bodies. Which has more prestige socially? which are regarded as higher ranking professionally? which has higher education or practice requirements? What is the historical relationship between them? What are or have been the conflicts between them? This is all basic information and is necessary for even minimal comprehension. Attention from an expert is clearly needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs) Latest revision as of 19:22, 3 May 2011

Good suggestion, David. However, it would be hard to write a WP:NPOV account of these aspects. The same goes for rival bodies in many other professions and jurisdictions, of course. Let's look out for reliable sources on the subject. - Fayenatic (talk) 09:38, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accountancy Age, a UK trade paper independent of all these bodies, is a good place to look and has an appropriate category: http://www.accountancyage.com/category/institutes - Fayenatic (talk) 11:27, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested rename to Accounting in the United Kingdom

I propose that this article should be renamed from British qualified accountants to Accounting in the United Kingdom, then repurposed and expanded accordingly. A couple of Asian countries so far have an "Accounting in..." article, and there is scope to build a set, along the lines of the national law articles linked by Template:Law in Europe. Some stubs on national institutes could helpfully be merged or moved to start such articles, e.g. OTOC which already distinguishes the OTOC from the other accounting body for Portugal. - Fayenatic (talk) 13:39, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Sorry for posting this in talk, which isn't strictly the best place for this, but anyway...to all the people who have created, updated and filled this page with useful content - thank you, I really appreciate it. I'm considering training courses (and providers) towards becoming an accountant, and this page and other pages linked with this page have put me on the right track to finding all the information I need within a couple of hours. Accountancy-minded Wikipedians have saved me a lot of time and hassle! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.231.248 (talk) 22:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British qualified accountants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101226042053/http://frc.org.uk/pob/ to http://www.frc.org.uk/pob/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British qualified accountants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111113154007/http://www.frc.org.uk/pob/publications/index.cfm?mode=list&cID=1 to http://www.frc.org.uk/pob/publications/index.cfm?mode=list&cID=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]