Talk:Brooke Amendment
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Djfiedler. Peer reviewers: Chermsmeyer.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Brooke Amendment notes/brainstorm[edit | edit source]
[edit]Hi wiki world, let's get this page going. Below are my preliminary research and notes. I found resources in the UC Davis database collections and google.
Bibliography:
[edit]- Wood, Carol Schwetschenau, "Section1983 and the Brooke amendment to the 1937 Housing Act"
- Pinkston, Loretta L. "The Brooke Amendment: does 'shall pay as rent' give tenants a right to sue?"
- Schill, Michael, "Distressed Public Housing: where do we go from here?"
- "Rights without Remedies: section 1983 enforcement of title iv-d of the social security act" University of Chicago Law Review
- https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr_edge_featd_article_092214.html
- https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=Legs_Chron_June2014.pdf
- http://www.legisworks.org/GPO/STATUTE-82-Pg476.pdf
- http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1700&context=law_urbanlaw
- https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.a0000107235 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djfiedler (talk • contribs) 03:29, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Highlights
[edit]Affordable housing = 25% of income
Questions to address and help add information
[edit]- How was this standard set?
- Who was against the passage?
- Was there public input?
- How did the implementation phase go?
- Is anyone looking at addressing this or modifying it?
- How could this be changed in the future, amended by Presidents? 35% vote in congress?
- Why was this change enacted?
- Was this part of a campaign promise or an effort to fix a large social problem? Chermsmeyer (talk) 17:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Critique:
[edit]Forbes.com "how senator brooke helped destroy public housing"
- Decreased funds for management => physical degridation. As tenant funds decreased, HUD subsidy ^^
- Work disincentive for the poor.
The atlantic "The power of public housing"
- public-housing authorities couldn't collect sufficient funds to maintain healthy living standards. Restating Goetz. Blames white flight, civil rights act 64.
- Drove working families out of the project