Talk:Bryant Homes
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Logo box
Remove the logo box as Bryant brand now being phased out and will have no continued existence? Bebington (talk) 10:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- I would retain it. If you look at the article on George Wimpey (which brand has been phased out and no longer exists) it is very interesting to see the old brands as they evolved over time - it forms part of the history Dormskirk (talk) 10:58, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
I have no strong feelings except to point out that the logo is essentially a Taylor Woodrow one which was there for only 6 years, hardly typical of the 100+ years of Bryant's independent existence. And, of course, the web link is bound to go before too long. Regards. Bebington (talk) 17:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. It would be even better if we could upload a logo from the pre-Taylor Wimpey era. Dormskirk (talk) 18:28, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bryant Homes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090107031744/http://www.bryanttrust.org.uk/about/history.html to http://bryanttrust.org.uk/about/history.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 27 July 2017 (UTC)