Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Incorrect example for regular expression.[edit]

It seems to be incorrect.

Fixed. 2022 Dec 9 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basilmozzarella (talkcontribs) 01:07, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References to C++03 language[edit]

I disagree with the comparisons to a "C++03" language in the article. AFAIK there has never been such a thing, and no compiler have ever supported a C++03 version of C++. They have supported C++98 until the switched to the next version of the core language C++11. There was no changes to the language itself in between, only errata to the C++98 standard.Carewolf (talk) 13:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then what is this: which is titled ISO/IEC 14882:2003 Programming languages -- C++? Do they publish an entirely new standards document just to handle errata?
franl | talk17:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudorandom number generation looks incorrect[edit]

uniform_real_distribution is misleading. It links to a general discussion of uniform distributions, in which x is generated as a <= x <= b. But the C++ implementation provides a <= x < b, which is more in line with what programmers expect. This sent me searching for another (nonexistent) option in C++ to provide < b. I didn't change the page but I think someone may want to check this out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 15:24, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

global std::begin and std::end not described[edit] - since C++11 (accompanied with std::cbegin and std::cend in C++14) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asashnov (talkcontribs) 15:56, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]