Talk:CSI: NY season 6

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: CSI / Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the CSI task force.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Merging Episode Pages

I think that the episodes don't deserve an actual page, since all of the info can be found on this page. I have already added merge tags to the first three episodes of the season. Please don't make any more of the pages since the pages might get deleted soon. Any thoughts? D4c3nt3n0 (talk) 20:07, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. In fact, we should put merger notices on the rest of the seasons, as well as the other episodes in the other series, they all just have plot info on them, nothing much notable on them at all. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 14:07, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know I have no involvement here and my oppinion really doesn't matter to you guys, but why not have episode articles? Its not like its wasting space. Lets get some people to clean them up, get some pictures posted, and put the summary into more detail. Pirakafreak24 ( Leave a Message ) I can sing! Ha!. 03:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because of notability. Episode articles require more than plot, they require behind the scenes information regarding production, ratings, reviews, awards etc with the use of reliable sources. I have no problem with people working on stuff like this, but it may be quite a task, with 229 Vegas, 191 Miami and 140 NY episode (560 in total, heck of a lot). Also, you can add more to the summary on the existing season pages. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 14:08, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Violations of WP:CRYSTAL & WP:OR

There are no citations on future episodes, other than what has appeared on Twitter and blog pages - which are still not valid citations. These need to be added or the episode information needs to be removed. 24.176.191.234 (talk) 19:59, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UK episodes 20 and 21 reversed

Despite what usually reliable sources such as the Radio Times and the Five website say, episodes 20 ("Tales from the Undercard") and 21 ("Unusual Suspects") were shown in reverse order in the UK (I know this is OR but I'm sitting watching the first UK showing of ep 20 at this moment, and it's 29 May). Ep 21: Unusual Suspects was shown on 22 May 2010 and ep 20: Tales from the Undercard on 29 May 2010. Any ideas on a source, more reliable than the ones I mentioned, to cite for this reversal? ~~86.148.167.29 (talk)~~ Tonywalton ^Talk 21:10, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on CSI: NY (season 6). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:59, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redemption

I know the edit page says not to add the n after “Redemptio,” but Paramount+ has the title listed as “Redemption.” Jhurley85 (talk) 22:16, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paramount+ made a mistake. It was "Redemptio" on the screen when it aired and on the DVD sets. IMDb has it wrongly listed as "Redemption". Spell check can be a bi*ch and some people are unable to proofread. Box99Tube (talk) 00:15, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]