Talk:Campbell Falls State Park Reserve

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Check 'what links here', there's also a Campbell Park in the UK that's linked. Sounds like we're in need of a page on it and a disambiguation page. --IByte 5 July 2005 22:43 (UTC)

I've removed the Wikipedia:WikiProject England tag on this article, as it is for the Connecticut park. Markvs88 (talk) 14:56, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio appears to be correct. Source Website excerpt:

This site is copyrighted. All photos, images, and design layout of the DEP Website are exclusively owned by the State of Connecticut and cannot be copied, edited, reproduced or used (outside the context of the DEP Website) without the written permission of the Department of Environmental Protection. No portion (text or graphics) of the DEP Website may be reproduced for sale.

IByte 6 July 2005 19:19 (UTC)

Started temp to replace copyright violation

There is a stub article on the Connecticut park at Campbell Park/Temp. This should be moved to Campbell Falls State Park Reserve (where I've created a redirect to Campbell Park for now) when the copyvio is deleted and the temp has been moved to replace it. A disambig page can then be written here. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 8 July 2005 19:28 (UTC)