Talk:Cape Wrath Trail

Scotland: Transport in Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Transport in Scotland (assessed as Mid-importance).

Hiking trails (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hiking trails, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Hiking trailsWikipedia:WikiProject Hiking trailsTemplate:WikiProject Hiking trailsHiking trails articles

Article support[edit]

I strated this article because there are lots of online references to it by experienced walkers and associations. Although it is not recognised as an official route it appears to have gained popularity amongst the community of hikers in Great Britain and there are at least 2 books published on the Cape Wrath Trail.

I would suggest the route locations be added (i have included 3 places), and distinguish where the 2 books differ. I also changed the text as a user had duplicated some text and started to wrtie from the point of view of a walker, giving advice and so on - this did not appear to be consistent with the encyclopedic style of Wiki. Please desist with this. Robdav69 15:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cape Wrath Trail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References modified[edit]

I made two changes, hoping to improve the articles presentation and hence its readability:

I reduced the 'volume' dedicate to the furst two guidebooks, since there are new published guidebooks and a lot of online material (web sites, blogs, vlogs etc.). Of course, the two books are still on the list of references.
I reshaped the reflist so that inline references would be consistent, and not a mixture of inline references and bibliography.

--GidiD (talk) 10:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]