|WikiProject Biography / Politics and Government / Science and Academia||(Rated Start-class)|
This article seems mostly POV and lacks references.
POV?? Is it possible to be entirely neutral about Clauberg? Did he have any good sides???
Either way, the numbers don't add up, so i agree with the requirement of references. it says that 700 women survived, but later says that 300 (400 LESS than the minimum) were experimented upon. Slokunshialgo 05:11, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
yes we all know he did not have any good sides but the article need sources and is written in bad english. It gives the impression that facts are exagerated Moroccan sky 07:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
The truth is that Carl Clauberg contributed to the advance of Science. Clauberg's test is obsolete nowadays, but it is a milestone in understanding the mechanics of Obstetrics-Gynaecology. This is the TRUTH, even it makes masonic-liberals pissed off. History is History and its actors' mind & actions aren't not black or white, they're gray (in different shades personnaly and through the Time).184.108.40.206 (talk) 01:28, 23 August 2014 (UTC)José Ferreira da Silva220.127.116.11 (talk) 01:28, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
it woudln't of beencos of hmi joining th nazi party at this time mmberships were flooding in and all these people weren't treated any were as near aswell as older member taking that it out.
I have heard of "The LSD Sterilization Plan of Nazi Germany". Was this drug developed by Clauberg with the intent of sterilizing humans? (I realize Hoffman is credited with the discovery but the evidence seems to point to Clauberg)
All bibliographical references can be found in the german version. Alexandre Rongellion (talk) 23:20, 3 June 2010 (UTC) I have inserted references to the law report from the trial against Hoess, which can be found on line at http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/Law-Reports_Vol-7.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandre Rongellion (talk • contribs) 00:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC) i HAVE SEEN THAT A BOT HAS CANCELLED ALL MY SERIOUS REFERENCE;;; IT IS A SHEER SCANDAL. FOR THE PRESENT TIME I AM NOT TECHNICALLY ABLE TO HANDLE THIS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandre Rongellion (talk • contribs) 11:11, 7 June 2010 (UTC)