Talk:Celtic Rite

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Celts

	Celtic Rite is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

From Wikipedia:Catholic Encyclopedia topics:

While the text is public domain PLEASE do not simply dump text from the CE into Wikipedia without modification. The Encyclopedia was written to serve the Roman Catholic Church and reflect its doctrine, therefore nearly every article has a distinct POV and no article should be included word for word. Format the text according to the Wikipedia Manual of Style. Correct any spelling errors. Rephrase any awkward-sounding prose to improve clarity and flow. Remove 19th century references unless they really move the text along. Update the articles with new information. Any text describing the "current situation" as of 1908 or 1913 should be revised as necessary.

Dominick ^(ŤαĿĶ) 14:46, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is a big article. I'll work on pruning it down and Wikifying it as I can find time. --Marcusscotus1 02:22, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I wish I had more time! Dominick ^(ŤαĿĶ) 21:08, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I did a major overhaul of the article tonight. It really was in terrible shape. I will revise this and put it in modern language as well as add some more, um, "secular" insight to the article. This could also use some tie-ins with the major Irish saints: Patrick, Brigid, etc. Meg 04:12, 14 December 2005 (UTC)Meg[reply]

Revision please

I know very little about liturgical history and found this article full of technical terms that are not explained. It could be a great deal shorter, for instance, Celtic Easter could be part of the WP Easter article. I am interested in recent and current attempts to revive a celtic apporach to prayer and worship but found this article indigestible. ---Vernon White 18:50, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

It’s still true that this article is so full of jargon that it’s unintelligible to the average reader, even one brought up a Catholic. It needs a vocabulary section or some (inter?-)wiki-linking. ⚜ Moilleadóir ✍ 02:24, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

translation, wikification, cleanup, editing, and cutting

wow, this article needs help! There's a lot of latin that isn't translated at all, a lot of bias, a lot of long, dense, paragraphs, it's not in wiki-style, the stuff from the catholic encyclopedia all has pov issues (as noted by others), it's got some REALLY long sections, lots of info could be better put in other articles (the stuff about easter fort example, which could also greatly benefit from an explanation of what these 19 and 80-something cycles MEAN) and in general, this article needs a lot of help, and I'm not the man for the job :( Yipely 02:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently an anonymous user. I added numerous paragraph breaks, translated several Latin phrases, clarified wording in a few places, and cleaned up some punctuation. But yes, a lot remains to be done. Perhaps I'll log in and do some more later. All this took an hour or more.

suggestion for reorganizing

I have two specific suggestions for managing this massive amount of often highly technical and detailed material. One, I propose creating a new article called something "Celtic Rite manuscripts" or "Sources for the Celtic Rite," and in the main Celtic Rite article presenting only an overview that would be sufficient for most people (with a "main article" notice). Alternatively, this section should be reorganized as a bulleted list rather than with subsections.

Two, I propose doing the same for a new article Celtic Rite Divine Office, which is a very long section that I just attempted to reorganize by subheads. The article now has two many subheads, though. Cynwolfe (talk) 14:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate

Can anyone who has written this article show ONE use of the term 'Celtic' in any of the so-called rites? No? Fergananim (talk) 19:29, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Celtic Rite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100111200315/http://www.bookofdeer.co.uk/bookofdeer.html to http://www.bookofdeer.co.uk/bookofdeer.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]