Talk:Centipede mathematics
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Centipede mathematics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Notability[edit]
I am unsure whether this is a notable concept. There's a mention in a book of mathematical anecdotes, but the majority of the text is sourced to two blogs. Does that add up to notability? Deltahedron (talk) 17:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- I share your concern. I recognise the concept described in the article but I agree that a couple of mentions in blogs (even if one of them is This Week's Finds...) is not sufficient to establish notability of the term. Gandalf61 (talk) 09:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
The first sentence of the article says "sometimes derogatorily". Not sure why this would be and the cited links doesn't seem to suggest this as far as I can tell. I think this should be removed.