This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
What would be the advantage of having such a card? The disadvantage I can see is that other people could see it, which would embarrass you and make you a potential victim of criminals. So why would anyone have such a card? 80.71.142.166 (talk) 08:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I propose removing many of the pop culture references in this section as some of them seem incredibly trivial—particularly the video game and literature ones. It feels as though they are just listed because they exist. See MOS:POPCULT. Furthermore, the music section appears as an incomprehensible block of text that contains such a vast mix of lyrics and names that it is hard to read and comprehend. I question whether all of those references are really necessary. On the other hand, I think the list of cardholders, and Film and TV section is mostly okay.
I'd like to know what others think before I go ahead and start removing the inconsequential ones.
