Jump to content

Talk:Cephalonomancy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So, are we keeping this article or not?

[edit]

I spotted this substub on recent changes more than two weeks ago. I flagged it for speedy, as it was nothing more than a dicdef, but the anonymous creator of the page deleted the template. I could have reverted at the time, but instead I left a message on his/her talk page encouraging further contributions. Nothing came of it, hence the second flag for speedy.

If this is not a speedy delete candidate, then I'll list it on VfD, but does everyone who keeps restoring the page really see it growing into much more than it is now? A web search turns up nothing more than dicdefs; the divination article is encouraging people by creating red softlinks to such articles. --Ardonik 19:17, 2004 Aug 4 (UTC)

Waterproof skulls, ambergris, and set-in frags

[edit]

Keep the article. That other creatures like to see human skulls has already been well-established as a perception and as a hedge against being overwhelmed by 'all other species' -- if ambergris holds fragrance why might it also hold images as a sort of whale-specific endeavor? We've all read about the bowl-cut hair-care technique. [This is and yet is not a joke.] .beadtot@AOL

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cephalonomancy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]