This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles
CISM is not "industry jargon". It is a security-related certification from ISACA, which in turn is a professional association related to IT audit, control and security (as opposed to a commercial entreprise) with curent membership of more than 50000 worldwide (please see ISACA's official website at http://www.isaca.org/ ). Regards, DPdH (talk) 23:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is the Question about currency of the "Improve" tag still needed?
I've noticed that this article has a tag doe "improving" it since June 2007, however no changes to it were made. I've compared its content with what is said about the CISM certification in the official ISACA website, and seems to be consistent. Additionally, seems to be reasonably well referenced for being a "stub". Is this tag still relevant? Can any more experienced editor help? If not, I'll remove the tag in a couple of weeks from now. Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 04:39, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirecting a page that had actual content to general presentation of governing body seems unnecessary deletion of relevant information. Should this page be returned to it's previous state (with updated info of course)? Pulssi (talk) 19:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]