Talk:Chanctonbury Ring

A fact from Chanctonbury Ring appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 March 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Romans built a temple possibly dedicated to a boar cult within the prehistoric Chanctonbury Ring hillfort?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chanctonbury Ring.

Wikipedia

Sussex Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Untitled[edit]

is it really necessary to make the word "soup" a link? and if so, why make soup a link, but not "trees" or "soul"?

Because soup is quite unusual to be a "valuable exchange for" human soul Would you like some soup?

....

"This time of year" -- which time of year?

Stub[edit]

This looks like more than a stub to me. Could the "This is a stub" bit at the bottom be removed?

I remember visiting about five years before the Great Storm and distinctly remember identifying the trees which were then well over 150 feet tall as lime trees. I also vaguely remember reading elsewhere that they were definitely lime trees. I don't think beech trees ever grow that tall or look that imposing. These were giants and I am almost certain they were limes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.156.164 (talk) 20:41, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"prehistoric"?[edit]

there was writing in the 7th century BCE. --142.163.194.123 (talk) 13:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not in the British Isles! The prehistoric era ended at different times in different places. Prioryman (talk) 11:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In Popular culture[edit]

I added a new section for it, because the ring features in one of my favourite books. Though only fans of the girls' school story genre may have heard of an old and obscure novel like that. Anyone know of any other novels, poems etc, that feature the place?̂LavenderAlice (talk) 11:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]