Jump to content

Talk:Chandpur District

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Religious composition

[edit]

This is as of 1991? Is there nothing more up to date? Seems like it would almost be irrelevant because it is so old. Cleanelephant (talk) 21:52, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Out of date" tag has been added to the article. Cheers, Freebirds Howdy! 14:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have updated the population and area statistics from this source. However, I have left the out of date tag in place because much of the article's data is still out of date. Cheers, Freebirds Howdy! 14:19, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

[edit]

A lot of it isn't consistent. Some use the type of institution number of institutions format and some are in bullet form. They should all be one. I think the bullet form would be best because it is confusing to read the lists separated by commas. Cleanelephant (talk) 21:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have done quite a lot of work attempting to clean up this article. It seemed like a total mess when I first read it. I have taken your suggestion on board Cleanelephant, re- using bullet points in lists (rather than have the lists separated by commas). I have also added Wiki-Links, and have tried to reference information by adding citations. (I may have gone slightly mad with the time and energy I've dedicated to this article; however I really wanted to clean it up.) Please feel free to give feedback etc, as I am always keen to learn from more experienced Wiki editors. Regards Jihadcola (talk) 17:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Jihadcola[reply]

listing

[edit]

Do we really need a list of every type of thing that this district has? I see no need to list Bazaars and then NGOs', etc. It seems like a desperate grab to include more content. I would vote that the truly notable items in these lists have a stub or article created for them and the rest removed. --RichardMills65 (talk) 22:47, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And now among the oldest articles listed as requiring copy editing. If only there were some copy to edit, it's pretty much just one big inventory. VєсrumЬаTALK 20:04, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have performed a copy edit of this article in order to improve the overall cohesion and fix the poor grammar. However, I still agree that this article is in desperate need of more relevant information. Freebirds Howdy! 14:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:53, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]