Talk:Chapter V (Staind album)
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Move?
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: move. — ξxplicit 04:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Chapter V (album) → Chapter V —
- Chapter V redirects to Chapter V (album), making the dab unnecessary. — ℳℴℯ ε 17:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Title Chapter V is not definite enough. Many things have a fifth chapter. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Right, but those works having a chapter 5 aren't themselves titled "fifth chapter" or similar. So unless we're gonna have a page listing 5th chapters of every book there is...--Cybercobra (talk) 00:12, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support per WP:NAMB --Cybercobra (talk) 00:12, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose much legislation also contains a fifth chapter, and those do get referred to as such. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 04:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment There are absolutely no other topics on Wikipedia titled
"Chapter V","Chapter 5", or "Chapter Five". I doubt Chapter V of the United Nations Charter would be simply called "Chapter V", and Chapter V: Unbent, Unbowed, Unbroken is different by having a longer title and we can deal with it using a hatnote. --Cybercobra (talk) 06:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment There are absolutely no other topics on Wikipedia titled
- Support per nom. Realistically, who would enter "Chapter V" (not "Chapter 5") and expect to find an article about a chapter of a book or document. Wikipedia doesn't have such articles anyway. For those who disagree, I'll add a hatnote to the article just in case. — AjaxSmack 02:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.