Talk:Charles Faroux/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: An anonymous username, not my real name (talk · contribs) 16:50, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I will gladly review this. The review should be ready shortly. An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 16:50, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid there are too many serious errors for such a short article. I've compiled them and some more minor things as well.

  • Infobox should have more information added.
  • The citation in the lead shouldn't be necessary because the information can be found in the body.
  • His birthday is never mentioned in the article.
  • Rename the career section to something like "Early life and career".
  • He visited the United States and spent several months in Alaska. [...] He saw the end of the war as a technician for Hispano-Suiza, where he was responsible for the supply of aircraft engines. The citation for these lines does and everything between them does not verify them.
  • Earwig has found copyright issues with the carom billiards section, which seems to have been copied verbatim from here.
    • Considering this is a translation of our French article, it seems high likely this was copied from our article on Faroux.Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Faroux died in February 1957 in Neuilly-sur-Seine near Paris. The citation here is for an article before his stated death, so naturally it doesn't support this claim.
  • The last section should probably be a table.

Unfortunately, I must fail this. My condolences. An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 17:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for taking a look, I've left some comments for a later future nom. Hope you don't mind Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:10, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies if I was a little overly strict with the review. I hope your future nomination is successful. An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 18:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not at all, there's clearly a few things to work on. Thanks for the review. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]