Talk:Charlwood

Surrey Mid‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notable people

There has been some rudeness put on this page by User:Ferdinand2 which I have deleted. I do not now want to amend the notable people which is obviously is written poorly. The previous editor also removed references. I will leave it to someone else to amend. SuzanneKn (talk) 17:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of parts of history section

There seems be be an abundance of largely irrelevant information in the history section. This is especially relevant in relation to the history of ownership of parcels of land and property. If the owners are non-notable, and the land/property itself is non-notable it is hard to see the point of including such detail in the history. Any suggestions as to why such ephemera should be included? CalzGuy (talk) 13:37, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hotels

"Charlwood has two hotels in imposing buildings...." but only identifies Stanhill Court. Presumably the other is Russ Hill - can anyone add details of the building's history ? RGCorris (talk) 10:05, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]