Talk:Chauhan dynasty

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chauhan dynasty article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to South Asian social groups, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

India: History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Origin and identity of the Chauhan Clan

This has been a very hot subject of discussion among historians due to extensive research and proofs in favour of the chaubans being Gurjars. Prithviraj Raso mentions Chauhans with Gurjar identity in multiple instances. Moreover, the local Rajasthan Deity (lok Devta) Devnarayan was also a Chauhan Gurjar. There is an article on him which Can be taken as a reference.

Even today, many politicians such as Sanjay Singh, Hukum Singh and Mriganka Singh etc. are from Gurjar Chauhan clan. All this has to be mentioned in the main article otherwise it doesn’t serve the purpose of knowledge to the general public neither it can be called unbiased which is the main feature of the Wikipedia articles. Superstarmotors (talk) 19:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]