Talk:Child labour law

}}

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Heather Richmond.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because... I have created and expanded on the Child Labour Laws as an assignment for my Global Youth Studies Class. When searching child labor laws or child labour laws it immediately redirected to the Child Labor Laws in the United States. I am looking at creating a page to expand on laws globally. It is meant as a page not to be about child labor but the laws surrounding it. I do plan on linking to the Child Labour Page as well as the Child Labor Laws in the United States. It would be helpful to have this page linked to laws of other countries or be expanded upon if seen fit. --Heather.Richmond (talk) 16:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because it is still in progress. I would like to reserve decision until the final draft is done December 10. Prof.Vandegrift (talk) 16:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge

This article is a fork of Child labour and does not particularly expand upon it in any way. It was originally proposed for speedy deletion, converted to a redirect as an alternative, and has now been restored. It was originally created as a student exercise and was restored by the course leader (info at Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Drake University/Global Youth Studies (Fall 2015). It appears the course work will be finished by 10 December. I do not believe this article in its current form should be kept but given its heritage have self-reverted a new deletion nomination. I propose that after 10 December it be restored to a redirect with any worthwhile content being merged to the target article. RichardOSmith (talk) 18:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, RichardOSmith. It's up to User:Heather.Richmond to identify the differences and make an argument for the content remaining as a separate article. Prof.Vandegrift (talk) 19:24, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]