Talk:Christmas Island (Jimmy Buffett album)

Fair use rationale for Image:Christmas Island (album).jpg

Image:Christmas Island (album).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Balance in Reception Section

I tend to sense a lack of balance in the reception section. We see a sentence that the album received lukewarm reviews and is unpopular among some, and then we get another few sentences about how some songs are popular and generally PR points about the album. As a result, I am going to insert a few quotes from critics about the album. Please let me know if this is problematic! U21980 (talk) 16:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well I don't necessarily see any bad reviews about the album (let alone any actual full reviews), so I went ahead and added what I could. U21980 (talk) 16:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]