Talk:City Bridge

Wales Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

Why is this article not called "Newport City Bridge"? Martinevans123 (talk) 20:46, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because that isn't the name of the bridge? Jeni ^(talk) 22:07, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that Newport has made a certain claim to global precedence which is more understandable in the context of that city than on the pages of Wikipedia? How many articles do we have called "City Hall"? Martinevans123 (talk) 07:29, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How many other bridges named "City Bridge" do we have on Wikipedia? My last count was 0 so there is no need for disambiguation. Jeni ^(talk) 08:37, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, careful Jeni, you must be tired out from all that counting. I was thinking more from the perspective of the non-frequent wiki user - if you search for "Newport City Bridge" you get 1,406 results, so maybe a redirect would be useful? I suppose everything is fine until someone decides that another city anywhere else in the world has a notable bridge with the same name. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:11, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]