Talk:City West Link

Australian Roads: New South Wales Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Australian Roads, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads and highways in Australian states and territories. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Australian RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Australian RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Australian RoadsAustralia road transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	New South Wales

This article has a KML file.

Australia: Sydney / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal City West Link is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[M4 Motorway (Sydney)#WestConnex M4|M4 Motorway]] The anchor (#WestConnex M4) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

POV Comments

With a little extra time, money and planning, and the need for only two or three bridges over the road, Sydney could have had a new freeway instead of a parking lot

Maybe this could be reworded to reflect the flow of traffic instead of being simply a negative comment?Garrie 04:02, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]