Jump to content

Talk:Ciurcopterus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCiurcopterus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starCiurcopterus is part of the Pterygotioidea series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 15, 2018Good article nomineeListed
September 25, 2018Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ciurcopterus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:34, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hi - I'll make copyedits as I go (please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning) and jot queries below: cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:34, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Measuring 70 centimetres (26.7 inches) in length - the imperial units should be rounded (unless the source is exactly 70 cm..or even 70.0 cm...)
Rounded the imperial measurements. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:48, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The type A genital appendage was undivided and the pretelson (the segment immediately preceding the telson) - "telson" and "type A genital appendage" need to be linked or explained...I see telson is linked in the next sentence, but should be linked and explained on first mention...which could be tricky here. Anyway, see what you can come up with.
Moved around the sentences to put the explanation of telson first. Attempted to explain type A genital appendage. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:48, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Shouldn't carinae be carinae (plural)?
Yeah, fixed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:48, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • link or explain "quadrate"
Done. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:48, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Again, the Paleoecology would be great if it just had a little bit more information (other critters etc.) to give the reader more of an idea about the environment it lived in.
Tried expanding it a bit. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:48, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copyvio clear/negative.

1. Well written?:

Prose quality: (see above)
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects: (see above)
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:


Overall:

Pass or Fail: - looks good apart from the couple of things pointed out above. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:38, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]