Jump to content

Talk:Clint Eastwood/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

As Mayor

The section which describes his mayoral race and term seems very critical of him [POV, I guess].

Examples below:

"Prior to the decision, residents were also polled by telephone about his candidacy, with heavy-handed questions..."

"During the campaign, many were shocked by Eastwood's inarticulateness and his lack of familiarity with important issues on the Monterey Peninsula..."

"...he fumbled for a moment and then responded, "Got any money, kid?" Audible groans came from several people in the audience."

"The media and fan circus surrounding the celebrity's election turned Carmel into a major police headache for several days before and after the election."

"Many felt he had accomplished his work by getting approval for his parking lot and had never had real interest in public service."

I'm not exactly sure what to do with this, but I thought I'd point it out.

None of the above have sources, either. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.123.107.119 (talk) 02:29, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I agree with the above. Almost all of the stuff on the mayoral race and his performance as mayor should be deleted since no sources are provided and the writer has an obvious ax to grind, ie, he or she doesn't like Eastwood. It reads as if written by a resident who didn't vote for Eastwood, perhaps even the "professor from a local college" who masquerades as the only thing even close to a source in this section. Theonemacduff (talk) 08:12, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

I removed all the unsourced/biased material here. Might not be a bad idea to have more info on his election and term as mayor, but it definately needs to be sourced and unbiased. Angryapathy (talk) 17:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Quotations

I just changed the Outlaw Josey Wales quote to the exact wording in the movie. For proof that this is correct see the .au sound files at http://www.anesi.com/east/sounds.htm. Amelia Hunt 01:04, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)

Can you quote the one from after the showdown? Chief Dan says, "What about the fourth one?" And Clint says, "You were there." Trekphiler 09:11, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Britannica "Biography of the Day" 31 May

I notice that today's Biography of the Day at britannica.com is on Clint Eastwood. Courtland 22:14, 2005 May 31 (UTC)

Filmography

Should Mystic River (movie) be included in the filmography? [unsigned at 20:40, 25 July 2005 by 70.104.230.122]

I think so, along with all the others that he directed without performance. Do we just list them with no role? We could then say that he directed but did not perform in those films for which no role is given. —Theo (Talk) 21:04, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

The filmography doesn't appear to include Bronco Billy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.64.12.187 (talk) 22:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

What about the anti-death-penalty movie "True Crime" ? 145.23.254.155 (talk) 05:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

The movie, "Joe Kidd" is missing from the filmography. Released in 1972, Elmore Leonard wrote the screenplay and John Sturges directed. Clint Eastwood played the main character, Joe Kidd. The movie also stars Robert Duvall and John Saxon. 66.241.90.71 (talk) 02:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Eastwood's production company "Malpaso" --as noted in the article--should be changed to "Malpaso Productions" and a link to this should be made to the Wikipedia article of the same name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.115.236.90 (talk) 19:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Allergic

I added the horse allergy (from "Biography", as I recall); not, considering his early career, spaghetti... Trekphiler 09:04, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

"Rare" 2nd Best Director Award

Of the 56 men (and they're all men) who've won a Best Director Oscar:

  • 38 have won one
  • 16 have won two
  • 2 (Capra and Wyler) won three
  • 1 (John Ford) won four.

That means 32% of Oscar-winning directors have won the award more than once. This is not "rare", but fairly common. I've amended the article. JackofOz 03:20, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

I took out "He would grow up to be one of the sexiest flabby men ever." It didn't seem to fit. - anon.

The Eiger Sanction

How did this film go unrecognized? I've added a few lines about Clint Eastwood's climbing skills. Baldyhut 02:16, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Killing Michael Moore

Clint's remarks that he'd kill Michael Moore if Moore ever showed up at his house with a videocamera were pretty obviously made for comedic effect. I've therefore changed "...threatened to kill liberal filmmaker Michael Moore..." to "...joked that he would kill..." as the remark was clearly a joke and not an actual threat.

Considering Eastwood is a conservative Republican and friends with Heston, he may indeed have been serious. I have therefore reverted the change.

...talk about humorless reactionaries...

Oh dear. Can you not accept your hero isn't a bleeding heart liberal? Get over it.

Eastwood is may vote Republican but he's more of a libertarian and has spoken out against hunting and in support of animal rights. People are a lot more complex than their party affiliation. I think Eastwood was seriously annoyed at Moore's cheap-shot tactics rather than anything political and of course the threat was a joke playing off his own tough-guy image. Get real people 67.160.174.24 (talk) 12:54, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

What?? He's automatically making a serious threat to Moore, and not joking, because he isn't a "bleeding heart liberal" ?? Where did that come from?

Oh, come on, people. You are arguing whether or not Clint Eastwood was serious about his intentions to murder Michael Moore. Seriously? Can we PLEASE keep the politics off of these pages? DFS (talk) 23:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Political Leaning

re: , although he described himself as a Republican in a 1997 interview.

The only 1997 interview I found referenced online was a Playboy interview where he described himself as Libertarian. I'm removing this line until a reference is provided for this interview.
- Jokermage "Timor Mentum Occidit" 04:03, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Can't seem to find that interview at this moment, but Eastwood is registered as a Republican in California and always has been.

Interestingly enough, I've found conservative websites claiming him as a Republican, and libertarian websites claiming him as a Libertarian. In this interview, he said "I don't see myself as conservative, but I'm not ultra-leftist. You build a philosophy of your own. I like the libertarian view, which is to leave everyone alone. Even as a kid, I was annoyed by people who wanted to tell everyone how to live." So he might be registered as a Republican, but he seems to think of himself as a libertarian. Can anyone provide more definate information, from relatively neutral sources? Jokermage "Timor Mentum Occidit" 23:26, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

He admitted to voting for Eisenhower in 1952 and 1956, and Reagan in 1980 and 1984.

We should probably just state something that his actual affliation is ambigious though he has definate libertarian views. It might be helpful to post references where he calls himself a republican and references where he calls himself a libertarian.
Eastword's political affliation is indefinate, as he has described himself as a Libertarian in some interviews and as a Republican in other interviews. His political philosophy tends towards libertarianism. Add in links to interviews for each claim and this might do the trick. Jokermage "Timor Mentum Occidit" 21:49, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

This quote would seem to indicate Eastwood is a Republican:

"The reason I became a Republican is because Eisenhower was running. A hero from World War II, a charismatic individual, a military man, a non-attorney - even then I liked that! I was a very young person voting for the first time. A lot of people joke that a conservative is a liberal who's made his first $100,000 and then decides, wait a second, I want to save this, why are they taxing it away? Today the country's in kind of a turmoil over taxing. Being raised in the thirties, watching my parents work hard to make ends meet, with jobs scarce, and then the war years - it tends to make a person a little more fiscally conscious than if you've been born into a wealthier family. You know, if you go to most people who are self-made and ask them what their political philosophy is, usually they're a little more conservative than people who had a better start."

^^Note^^ He never SAYS that he is a Republican in that quote, it is your own PERSONAL INTERPRETATION. Please, people, cite facts, not your own opinion. Here is a quote from the last year where Eastwood says he is more of a Libertarian.

Quote from 2008 : "I haven't been very active in politics. Yes, I started out as a Republican in 1951; I was a young 21-year-old in the Army, and I wanted to vote for Dwight Eisenhower. He, like all politicians, was always promising something, and he promised he would go to Korea and end the Korean War. But the Republican Party, as has the Democratic Party, has changed dramatically in the 50-some years that I've been involved with it, so I've sort of drifted to a more Libertarian point of view." source: http://defamer.gawker.com/5060140/exclusive-clint-eastwood-likens-08-election-to-oprah-car-giveaway DFS (talk) 00:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

well, maybe killing moore would be to much, but beating the hell out of that fatso would be just fine! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.12.246 (talk) 19:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Clint Eastwood may drift towards the libertarian point of view, but that in no way makes him a member of the Libertarian party. You shouldn't randomly capitalize L's like that. The Libertarian party is much more extreme than most libertarians and many libertarians are registered Republicans. He could definitely be a libertarian Republican. Has he ever said that he was a libertarian Libertarian? I think not. 74.251.8.247 (talk) 09:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Eastwood has been a registered Republican since 1951. (92.10.216.40 (talk) 15:36, 23 September 2009 (UTC))

B-movie actor?

How exactly does a twice-Oscar-nominated leading man qualify as a "B-movie actor"?

Because he can't act.

This is simply not true. He is limited - as many of the great Hollywood stars have been - but take in the range represented by Unforgiven, Bronco Billy and The Bridges of Madison County!

He plays "Clint Eastwood" extremely well. And extremely successfully for the last forty years... 193.164.126.35 18:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Graeme

Like John Wayne, Eastwood is a star, not an actor.

I think it's a bit of a stretch to say he can't act. Cdwillis 21:11, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

I think Eastwood will be remembered more for his directing than his "acting". That is what separates him from the other tough guy movie stars like Stallone, Schwarzenegger, Norris, Seagal etc.

I think that Eastwood will be remembered for everything he has done. If he was not the actor that he is, then he wouldn't have been in so many movies that were a success. Think about it. In movies such as TG,TB,TU could you imagine someone like Tom Hanks or Orlando Bloom playing the role of The Man With No Name? He was THE original tough-guy.

John Wayne was THE original tough guy, and like Eastwood lasted by playing the same part in every movie. The fact is very few talented actors can become movie stars, instead we are stuck with Eastwood, Harrison Ford, Chuck Norris, Sylvester Stallone, Arnold Schwarzenegger etc. Eastwood will be remembered as a good director but a talentless block of wood in the acting department. Any tough guy actor could have played the Man with No Name - Charles Bronsosn, James Coburn, Lee Marvin, etc.

Excuse me? Not an actor. He was great in his old western films.

What, playing himself? Great.

A) this is all POV B) he was in Unforgiven, Dirty Harry... hardly the work of someone who "can't act."-9/7/06

Sinatra, Wayne, Mitchum and many others could have played Harry Callahan. Unforgiven is a vastly overrated revisionist anti-western. Eastwood has very little acting ability and his delivery is so pathetically poor. Like many other untalented leading men however, he was a major star for years. Probably because Americans have no taste.

Well America produced the finest film actors of the 20th century, so perhaps our taste isn't quite so bad. And unless you forget, Eastwood was given his start in filmmaking by Europeans, in those spaghetti westerns. Maybe non-Americans don't have good taste then? As for Dirty Harry, sure; Sinatra, Wayne, Mitchum, they could have played Dirty Harry in their own distinct styles and been successful with the role. That still doesn't negate what Eastwood did with that character. And to call Unforgiven overrated, well, if that's the case then I guess 80-90% of the movies I've seen in my life have been no good, since not many of them were better than Unforgiven. Underlying point; this is all POV, and none of it belongs in the article.-9/14/06

Well America produced the finest film actors of the 20th century - whatever.

Maybe non-Americans don't have good taste then? - We don't watch stupid Eastwood westerns.

That still doesn't negate what Eastwood did with that character. - It was the director and scriptwriter, not that block of wood.

then I guess 80-90% of the movies I've seen in my life have been no good, since not many of them were better than Unforgiven - In your opinion. Unforgiven sucked ass.

Setting aside everyone's personal taste, one must remember that these things are cast by someone - the director, or a minion - so if that person wants a certain type of actor, they'll find one, even while also picking through the "big names" for sales purposes. Eastwood is by no means on the same low level as Chuck Norris, Sylvester Stallone, Arnold Schwarzenegger, or Stephen Seagal (my personal favourite; none of the others actually pretend to any intellectual mission!). The guy can direct, and play a certain spread of personalities. Enough. And would you all please sign your names? Quadra 17:20, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

So what; if he act like he does , not fullfilling dull heroe dreams of american false male sucker, but contercarates this myth folies, he is a great 'B_movie Player. The material to build dreams of heroism on, has been chewed and this variation of sensibility and force shows a western actor in which class? A doesn't mean best at all, because A and B is a dialectic system to reveal values and probably leeds to solution and synthesis in figures or story, which are innovationable. He fullfilles profiles with question in not giving wrong answers. Beeing a democrat acting on myth and somehow dekonstruct there stupidity he works on an intelligent level of film class. [Rosaura, from europe] not monnica or claus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.76.34.181 (talk) 17:21, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

What is this person talking about? What a bizarre statement.67.160.174.24 (talk) 12:59, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


we don't find the right pictures for an example.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yakutzi (talk • contribs)


This conversation has really lost its way. The simple fact is that Eastwood got his start as a B movie actor and that the term "B movie" has really lost meaning in this modern day. Today, we would call them "indie films". Don't mistake the A/B movie designation as a statement of quality; An "A-movie" is not better than a "B-movie", it is a different style of filmmaking. If you read interviews with Eastwood, he is very, very clear about his roles and he calls them B-movies. If you read legitimate, real film criticism, they generally agree. DFS (talk) 01:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Jazz Piano not mentioned in Trivia Section

There's no mention here of the fact that Clint Eastwood plays pretty good jazz piano - that's him actually playing in the scenes in Line Of Fire.

The Man With No Name

This cannot, of course, be the same character in all three films.

Presuming that Fistful is set at some unspecified time in the typical western era, Few Dollars More is certainly set many years after the Civil War. GBU is set during the Civil War and Clint looks not a day younger!

A Doctor Who sort of thing going on here? 193.164.126.35 18:55, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Graeme

I don't think you are supposed to notice things like that.

The Man With No Name is not a single man. He is supposed to represent Sergio Leone's idealized version of a gunslinger... completely ruthless and stoic with a strong sense of honor. Furthermore, since the plots of the movies are unconnected, who said they had to be in chronological order?

I heard somewhere on Sergio Leone's Forum that Leone himself said "the man with no name" is the same charactor in the "dollars" trilogy.

Just take the movies for what they are. Some people will always see it GBU as a prequel to the other movies, some will always say they are seperate movies. Just take your perception and stick with it.

Recent Editing

Hello. I did some editing on this article, hope you don't mind:

  1. I believe that the quotations paragraph, great as it was, does not belong in the article, especially when there's a whole bunch of them on wikiquote.
  2. I added one of those boxes (or whachamacallit). The thing is that I just copy/pasted one from the Harrison Ford article, and filled it out as best as I could.
  3. I moved the pictures around a little.

Unfortunately, I don't have enough time to finish the job. Cheers, Fenrir2000 13:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Well then I will take to the proposition of finishing your correctionZach93 00:49, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

No homepage...

Many have asked why put anything in the "homepage" section of the actors' bio box if there is no official website?

Why not? 2 reasons.

First, it saves the user a lot of wasted time on search engines looking for one.

Second, it gives the impetus for these people to get an official website!

'Nuff said?

trezjr 20:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

His mayoral election

This sentence is a little odd: "On election day, April 8, 1986, with double the voter turnout, Eastwood garnered 72.5% of the vote and was elected to a position that paid $200 per month."

"With double the voter turnout" doesn't make a lot of sense. Double the expected turnout? Double last year's turnout? It reads like something's missing from the sentence. Does anybody know exactly what was intended here? JdwNYC 18:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Any Which way?

Eastwoods "Any Which way" films may not be his most significant or best but are certainly some of his more famous.

I mean most people know about clint "Clide" his sidekick monkey who would punch anybody Clint indicated and ride alone with him in his truck. And the films have permuated into humourous pop culture far more than anything bar Dirty Harry and "The man with no name" characters. From what I can gather they were also some of his bigger hits.

Surly it deserves some reference and discussion even if the "critical" types would rather overlook them.

You're right. Without adjusting for inflation, those 2 movies are his biggest box-office hits. I'll add information about them to the introduction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lookmeupinla (talk • contribs) 20:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Trivia Items

Perhaps a mention around the urnban myth that he is the illigitimte son of stan laurel? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.155.189.88 (talk) 05:04, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Under the 'leisure' heading, "shoot-em up" and hunting are non-sequiter topics; Hunters don't "shoot-em up", and since this phrase generally refers to 'bad guys vs. good guys' or 'police/military/(& even sci-fi) action' themes, the inference is that hunters are irresponsible or, worse even, criminals, which is biased and unfounded in FACT. DELETE the liberal 'bent', okay ?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.243.212.108 (talk) 21:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

There was a very good suggestion on Wikipedia:Trivia talk page that trivia items should be put on the article's talk page first for discussion, editing, debate, sourcing, etc ESPECIALLY questionable bits of trivia. When I saw this entry in the Eastwood trivia section, it fairly screamed to be moved here:

This seems more like just random information that doesn't even rise to level of interesting tidbit. I could understand if Letterman was a well known musician or critic and this would relate to Eastwood's love of jazz and playing, but it just seems pointless. RoyBatty42 18:13, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

---He is one of only two living directors (along with Milos Forman) to have directed two Best Picture winners----

Coppola is dead? Who knew.

So does he really speak Italian, or was he just reading off the teleprompters at the Oscars? --Billdorr 04:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Very good question! At least it appears that he knows it. --Roland 09:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Acceptance speeches are not scripted (unless they made an exception in this case). I would be very surprised if he did not at least of a rudimentary knowledge of Italian considering his collaborations with so many Italian directors over the years. Perhaps someone can confirm? Zerbey 21:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
I removed the reference until an actual source is fetched. To say is he speaks fluent Italian "… as evidenced …" from that episode is ridiculous. I am perfectly willing to believe that Eastwood has some ability with the language, but to provide on-the-spot interpreting? Let's get real until we have something vaguely more convincing. -- Andrew 01:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

-- I just read this article http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/movies/14head.html?ref=movies he says that he is not a vegan second paragraph 24.16.213.202 (talk) 08:35, 11 December 2008 (UTC)the diva

Heh-- me too. But the vegan item had a source! Surely a vegan advocacy group's website, featuring unsourced quotes, is an unbiased, reputable source of information! My college newspaper editor would be sobbing under her desk in frustration if I tried this in an article... ahh, I love Wikipedia. Msr657 (talk) 12:48, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Actually, there was a seemingly equally reputable source, from June 2008, for the vegan claim: the LA Times. http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/movies/la-ca-clint1-video-2008jun01,0,4638311.story Given his outright denial in the NYT piece, I'm inclined to believe that he's not. But the earlier claim wasn't baseless. Andersem (talk) 19:38, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
I also deleted the 'animal rights activist' thing, since I suspect that's just an assumption derived from the vegan quote. (Note: my edit summary was cut off by accident; I meant to say "given that the 'vegan' thing was a lie, this should be pre-emptively deleted as well".) Redquark (talk) 02:24, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Image problem

The current image looks bad. The article should be headed with an image from his prime. Indianapolis 21:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Terrible angle. Shouldn't it be a more "iconic" image of the Eastwood most people have come to know over time? Not from 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.186.21.179 (talk) 01:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Doctor Eastwood

On May 11th, 2007, Clint Eastwood received an honorary Doctor of Humane Letters from the University of Southern California. He was subsequently referred to during the ceremonies as "Doctor Eastwood". Graduates and audience members called for him to speak when he stepped up to the podium, but he returned to his seat without speaking.

Dr Eastwood - I like it! His spaghetti westerns are some of my favorites of all time! Isnotwen (talk) 13:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Clint Eastwood linked to Nelson Mandela rugby drama

I've heard rumours of Clint Eastwood directing an upcoming big-budget Hollywood film based on former South African President Nelson Mandela and his appearance at the 1995 Rugby World Cup final.

Can anyone (maybe the authors of this entry)confirm this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.241.52.80 (talk) 14:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Early photos of Eastwood indicate he may have been sympathetic to right wing groups. The Klan have been mentioned on several occasions. Such opinions mesh with Eastwood's willingness to drop into roles such as Dirty Harry where the objective was clearly to fan the flames of a fascist backlash. Research into this with relevant photos (with the 'secret' Klan codes) might be interesting to help explain this enigmatic individual.

WP:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers priority assessment

Per debate and discussion re: assessment of the approximate 100 top priority articles of the project, this article has been included as a top priority article. Wildhartlivie (talk) 11:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Allergic to horses

Eastwood ironically is allergic to horses.

First of all, there's a citation needed and second of all, due to him being a vegetarien, that's not ironic at all. It would be ironic if he was allergic to vegetables, but this is not irony just a fortunate coincidence. --RasNehemia (talk) 12:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

IT'S IRONIC BECAUSE HE'S BEEN IN A ZILLION MOVIES AND TV SHOWS AS A HORSE RIDIN' MAN!!!!! 67.160.174.24 (talk) 13:04, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

-and first of all he is himself a horse in chinise astrologic system. To be allergic of oneself is real strange! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.76.34.181 (talk) 17:52, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Mr. Eastwood is not a vegan, and he looked slightly aghast when told exactly what a vegan is. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/movies/14head.html 98.247.77.63 (talk) 01:09, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Good source

Eastwood, governor's in-law off parks boardUser:calbear22 (talk) 18:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

"Crint" Eastwood?

An editor recently added to the Lead "also spelled Crint Eastwood", giving as a reference The Story of Writing by Andrew Robinson. I've removed this because:

  1. no context is provided – by whom and where is it so spelled?
  2. is this widespread or local to certain Asian countries?
  3. although mentioned in the Lead, it is nowhere discussed or explained further in the body of the article
  4. if it's a localized dialect or satire by a small minority, placing it in the Lead gives it undue importance.  JGHowes talk 05:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Palme d'Or

On February 25, 2009, Eastwood was presented with a special Palme d'Or by Gilles Jacob, president of the Cannes Film Festival. This was a special award for lifetime achievement, not an accolade for his 2009 entry Gran Torino. The Cannes Film Festival is held each May. (citation : http://www.sacbee.com/977/story/1652973.html ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by DFS (talk • contribs) 23:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

MIddle names of Kyle and Alison

whoever made that edit needs to be blocked---at least temporarily. Alison Eastwood does not have a middle name, and the middle name of his son is incorrect on here. Besides, middle names are not necessary. The "domestic partner" box was deleted. I will put it back on, but note that he only LIVED with two women (frances fisher & sondra locke) but never co-habitated with any of the other mothers of his children.Lookmeupinla (talk) 03:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Advertising and out of context?

Quote from the text: "In 2001, he was appointed to the California State Park and Recreation Commission by Governor Gray Davis.[32] He was reappointed in 2004 by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger,[33] whom he supported in the elections of 2003 and 2006. Soon afterwards Governor Schwarzenegger announced a proposal to close 80 percent of California State Parks. To know more about Clint Eastwood and the state park system, see his short film on Save Onofre State Beach.[34]"

From "Soon afterwards" doesn't really seem like it fits together with the rest of the text, and "to know more" sounds more like advertising about that particular short-film than as encyclopedic content - and I haven't seen that used on Wikipedia before, either.. T-roland (talk) 21:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Relationships and family section

A monstrous-scale collection of BLP violations; there was hardly a line without an unsourced claim that demanded referencing. The tone was intrusive and unencyclopedic. I've cut it back to the clearly established public information. While there is certainly a case for adding back some of the deleted information, really solid references (not, for example, IMDB) is required for much of it. And the surviving text certainly could use improved sourcing and phrasing that carefully reflects whatever sources are found. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 04:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Awards in lead section

Is the "Brass Balls" award from Spike TV notable enough to be mentioned among the Oscars and Golden Globes in the lead? There are hundreds of awards they throw around these days on various channels, what makes this one worthy of inclusion? - SoSaysChappy (talk) 03:36, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Scott Eastwood

Scott Eastwood isn't mentioned as one of Clint's offspring. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Eastwood He appeared with him in Gran Torino which lead me to look at this page. I'm not good editing these articles, so can someone add Scott to the family section? thanks.

where was the movie Joe Kid filmed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.91.199.108 (talk) 00:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

The thing is, I was just wondering about this, after I saw the movie Pride (which got over less than an hour ago, on TNT), and I went to the article for that movie, but that link to Scott Reeves in the "Trivia" section had me confused, since it went to another person by that name - But since he is also an actor, at first I thought it was the correct link!
Thank you for pointing out that there is actually an article for the correct "Scott Reeves" - but under his new name. I have corrected that "Trivia"-link mention in the Pride article section - While leaving the "Scott Reeves" text the same (since he was credited by that name, in the film), I changed the link, to the article you just made me aware of. I also added one of those disambiguation-type lines ("other uses") to the Scott Reeves article (though perhaps not with the best syntax; I roughly copied & pasted it, from one of the President George Bush's articles - I don't even remember for sure which one!)...
I have also now added a paragraph to the pertinent section of this entry, as you requested. It mentions not only Scott, but his younger sister Kathryn, both of whom were borne by Jacelyn Reeves. I even added the IMDB citation! (There are complaints I see about that section's lack of cited references.)
Thanks again, for pointing this out! (It's troubling that, for a person so famous, and for a son who is also an actor in major movies - and even has his own article! - there was no mention. I wonder if it was there in the past, and someone removed it?) Pacificus (talk) 07:09, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

unforgiven

ONLY MISTAKE I NOTICED IN EASTWOOD'S MOVIE, "UNFORGIVEN", WAS DURING THE POSSE'S CONVERSATION . ONE IS HEARD TO SAY, "THE HARDWARE STORE WON'T GIVE US ANY MORE 30-30 SHELLS 'TIL WE PAY". THE 30-30 CARTRIDGE (30WCF) WAS NOT INTRODUCED UNTILL 1894. R. JONES////

That Picture

Scares me. Seriously, look at that nose. Those eyes. His very mouth, and the lighting makes him look all the scarier. 24.147.157.5 (talk) 23:56, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Clint Eastwood/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

SCOTT REEVES, Clint Eastwood's son: The link leads to Scott Reeves, actor/singer, from Young and the Restless fame. This is not the Scott Reeves that is Clint Eastwood's son and NEEDS to be removed.

Last edited at 04:01, 22 June 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Clint_Eastwood/Archive_1&oldid=1144723946"