Talk:Clydach Vale
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge with Blaenclydach?
[edit]If no-one objects, I think it would be a good idea to move Blaenclydach to this article. I believe a difference may have existed in 1900 but the adjoining communities can be considered to have intermerged long age. Blaenclydach in WP has no content except a Geograph photograph. I'm asking the photographer if he has any objection or comment. Cheers Bjenks (talk) 02:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- No objections here. If someone has something to say about Blaenclydach at a later date they can always write over the redirect. FruitMonkey (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- OK, that's done, then. Cheers Bjenks (talk) 13:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Nant Clydach
[edit]Here's a site which says the Nant Clydach is a tributary of the Taff, not the Rhondda. Any thoughts on that one? I can't find an online map which gives the answer. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 13:31, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- The issue seems to be settled by this quote from the Welsh Government's River Taff Corridor Action Plan, April 2007, p. 7
So I'm changing it, and also fixing up the River Taff article. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 03:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)At Quakers Yard, the Taf Bargoed and Cynon merge with the Taff and slightly further downstream the Nant Clydach joins. At Pontypridd, the Rhondda merges and the valley further broadens out and runs through Treforest towards Cardiff in the lower reaches of the South Wales Valleys. . .
I have a problem with this. The maps, including the Natural Resources Wales flood map which is used to define river categories show the Nant Clydach flowing into the Rhondda at Tonypandy. The Rhondda flows for another 5km to the confluence with the Taff, and therefore I think the article as edited is now incorrect. Jonathan Mead, SE Wales Rivers Trust. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathan Mead (talk • contribs) 14:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Are you saying that the Nant Clydach is not a tributary of the Taff (as WP also says in the article on the Taff}? If so, please advise us what your revised wording would be, and provide clear references to the cited maps to verify the information. You might also need to explain any variance from the above-cited River Taff Corridor Action Plan, April 2007, p. 7 Bjenks (talk) 05:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Clydach Vale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718143750/http://webapps.rhondda-cynon-taff.gov.uk/heritagetrail/rhondda/clydachvale/clydachvale.htm to http://webapps.rhondda-cynon-taff.gov.uk/heritagetrail/rhondda/clydachvale/clydachvale.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003130044/http://archive.rhondda-cynon-taf.gov.uk/treorchy/index.php?a=forward&s=item&key=FYTozOntpOjA7aToyMzkyNztpOjE7aTozO2k6MjtzOjQyOiJMb2NhbGl0eSBpcyByZWxhdGVkIHRvIHRoZXNlIExpYnJhcnkgSXRlbXMiO30%3D&pg=61 to http://archive.rhondda-cynon-taf.gov.uk/treorchy/index.php?a=forward&s=item&key=FYTozOntpOjA7aToyMzkyNztpOjE7aTozO2k6MjtzOjQyOiJMb2NhbGl0eSBpcyByZWxhdGVkIHRvIHRoZXNlIExpYnJhcnkgSXRlbXMiO30%3D&pg=61
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)