Jump to content

Talk:Concept inventory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Concept Inventory entry does a poor job of distinguishing a CI from any other large-scale standardized test for which there is a pass-fail threshold. For example, the emphasis on "research" to justify CI distracters is not a distinguishing feature. There is research and systematic development of distractors for all (or nearly all) professionally developed norm referenced tests. Furthermore, a norm-referenced test can have a criterion pass-fail point, using scales that are norm referenced.

It was not my intent to show that the research on distractors distinguishes CIs from other tests. What I tried to do is to show the reader why research on distractors is important. The distractors selected by a student completing a CI ought to shed light on the student's understanding of the concept in question.Iss246 (talk) 21:03, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Concept inventory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:44, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]