Jump to content

Talk:Conflict of marriage laws

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Contract (conflict) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 20:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Polygamy

[edit]

Article states : "In some economically poor areas where infant mortality is high but children are a vital source of labor to maintain the earning capacity of the family, polygamy provides more children. Yet, in more modern times, some Christian states despite the existence of polygyny in the Bible have defined marriage as the union of one man to one woman "to the exclusion of all others"

Problem: this statement, while derogatory in context, displays a massive ignorance regarding Biblical texts. The Bible contains many large historical narratives that record history. Because you can find an individual that murdered someone, raped someone, committed incest, etc etc, does not mean it is condoned or accepted in Christian morality. That said, I find it misleading that the author did not bother to look up the Biblical texts that specifically address the morality of this issue (and not the historical books). I also find this statement comical in that the author believes their 2 cent knowledge of Christianity trumps the 2000 years of writings of the Church (New Covenant writings).

For these reasons (the opinionated nature and misinformation) I will delete this portion. Perhaps the author may instead wish to include a section on biblical recorded polygamy instead of accusing the religion of not understanding their own Holy Book. 50.93.123.217 (talk) 19:41, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I concur. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 17:41, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conflict of marriage laws. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conflict of marriage laws. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Polygamy

[edit]

This whole article seemed to be a WP:SOAP about how polygamy is normal, good and desirable; and how it is unnatural to ban polygamous marriage. This is very inappropriate because: 1) it violates WP:NPOV and 2) it hijacks the article which is supposed to be about the legal concept of conflict of laws as it applies to marriage laws, not about the rights and wrongs of polygamy. Most of the text on polygamy is also unsourced and WP:OR. I removed part of it, but more work needs to be done. 2A02:2F0F:B2FF:FFFF:0:0:6463:C62A (talk) 23:28, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Conflict_of_marriage_laws&oldid=1201097935"