Talk:Congressional Life Saving Medal

Military history: North America / United States red‑class

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:Banner/ Military historymilitary history articles

red

This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Orders, decorations, and medals Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:Banner/ Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Result was Merge

Merger discussion[edit]

I propose to merge Congressional Life Saving Medal and Lifesaving Medal. Both articles are a little on the light side from a content standpoint. However, the merger of the two with copy editing will make for a stronger article. It is my belief that the most common name of the medal is Lifesaving Medal, so the merge should go that direction. EricSerge (talk) 19:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Support. In fact, I'm not sure discussion is required, this is a clear case of duplicate article.--Muhandes (talk) 19:49, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles merged. EricSerge (talk) 20:19, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.