Talk:Conscription in Russia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Russia: History / Military Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Resistance/opposition

There must be some sort of resistance or at least opposition, whether organized or not. I know there was a certain amount even in the USSR back in the 80s during the Afghanistan occupation. Cgingold (talk) 23:04, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They're all in prison (up to 2 years, about a thousand people per year) or avoiding it in other ways. If you look at Ukraine you'd see that 55% of people ignored the law of mandatory conscription, times has changed, people are being more informed about politics BS and have freedom attitudes, Russia isn't much different from Ukraine imo. Here's some data: http://www.refworld.org/docid/56b069114.html Gendalv (talk) 22:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abolition

Does anybody know the plans to abolish it?--87.92.71.209 (talk) 10:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Conscription in Russia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080407060714/http://www.russiatoday.ru:80/news/news/22882 to http://russiatoday.ru/news/news/22882

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:39, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3 years conscription in the Navy

Was it abolished - and when ? --129.187.244.28 (talk) 12:54, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

beginning of 1991 it was reduced from 3 to 2 years (see: IISS, MB 1991/92) --129.187.244.28 (talk) 06:05, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The two-year conscription term in force since 1967 continued unchanged after the Soviet Union dissolved until the mid-2000s

...which is in fact not true. In 1993, 18-month-service was introduced. --129.187.244.28 (talk) 14:12, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Russian Military Conscripts.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading sentence about Tsarist times

"Muslims, Finns and members of other racial or religious minorities were generally exempted from conscription" -- However, Jews were NOT exempted... AnonMoos (talk) 23:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conscription vs National Service

Why is it that this article is named Conscription? Indeed, in the wider context of mainstream news media, the term of conscription is used consistently. Yet, countries such as Great Britain, Germany, & Netherlands, get to call their conscription National Service. They were and are accorded that respect in the mainstream news media. Why not Russia? After all, as per the article, Russia demands just twelve months of service from its youth. Whereas the other nations demand two years.

I cannot see this as anything other than discriminatory propaganda. DieselEstate (talk) 05:42, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no longer 18

it is now 21 -30. they changed it this year. none of you would have known this because our search engines censors results and our media makes no effort acknowledge, but to demonize others. here is an article about it from USA state sponsored propaganda. https://www.rferl.org/a/bill-russian-lawmakers-raising-draft-age-21/32315660.html#:~:text=A%20draft%20law%20raising%20the%20age%20of%20conscription,30%20years%20of%20age%20from%20the%20current%2027.