Talk:Craigmillar Castle

Edinburgh Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Edinburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Edinburgh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EdinburghWikipedia:WikiProject EdinburghTemplate:WikiProject EdinburghEdinburgh articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scottish Castles

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scottish Castles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Castles in Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Scottish CastlesWikipedia:WikiProject Scottish CastlesTemplate:WikiProject Scottish CastlesScottish Castle articles

Military history: Fortifications / British / European / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Craigmillar Castle has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 25, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

Photographs...

I have photographs of Craigmillar Castle here - you pick 'em and I'll upload 'em. Put any requests on my talk page. Ka ro ra 10:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Craigmillar Castle/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 18:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Initial review

A good article, the only "problem" so far is a missing reference for Lindsay.Pyrotec (talk) 19:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maurice Lindsay now added to the bibliography, thanks for spotting. Regards, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 09:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GAR

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
A good read

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Congratulations. You now have GA.Pyrotec (talk) 15:53, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Origins

I changed the link on Simon Preston as it pointed to the wrong wiki page Family locator (talk) 09:52, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've removed all the Preston links for now, as none of them have articles at present. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 10:18, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I came across, following up our discussion on other topics, a book, in public domain which may be of interest to you on this article: The antiquities of Scotland (1797); Francis Grose which, amongst other topics discusses Craigmillar. It may have some fill-in material of interest and certainly has a couple of interesting graphics.

Hope it helps

Family locator (talk) 03:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]