Talk:Criticism of Windows XP

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

TCP socket limit[edit]

The TCP socket limit criticism section was sourced to a blog, and then a DIY "patch" from a file sharing site. It was also poorly written. I think the socket limit section may have a reliable source out there, and I've got no prejudice to a properly sourced and better written paragraph about it. For now, I've deleted it. It sat in the article long enough to find good sources. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

PROPOSAL: split section License refunds to Windows refund[edit]

Currently Windows refund redirects to the section License refunds (which is my fault :). The last few edits were about Vista refund case, probably due to the redirection I placed. I'd like to propose moving this section to a Windows refund article, and move all the info over there. Fuzzy (talk) 17:24, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Done. Fuzzy (talk) 20:59, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Good work, buddy!--Kozuch (talk) 10:27, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Section about Clock changes is not accurate?[edit]

Just a thought... don't you guys all think there's a good reason XP didn't want the time to be tampered with by unauthorized individuals?

Changes to the system time can mess up updates, parental controls, expiration dates for trial ware (legal issues), and otherwise screw up a computer.

We should make it so either it's not talked about or so that it makes sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TangLab (talkcontribs) 16:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Product Activation Criticism?[edit]

Could someone please explain why the "Project Activation" section is here? It just seems to be a section explaining how the activation works to avoid illegals installations of XP. At no point does it explain or reference why this is a bad thing, and presumably therefore a criticisim. This topic seems to be covered better in the main Windows XP article, where it actually has some criticism of this method. Propose to delete the section from the article? 87.194.252.95 (talk) 22:10, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Criticism[edit]

I merged the Criticism section of the main WinXP article into this article. Its a mess, but i didnt wrote this chunk. StoneProphet (talk) 15:25, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Criticism of Windows XP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)