Talk:Céligny

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Céligny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

exclavity

The larger one consists of the village of Céligny on a hill above Lake Geneva along with the small Le Brassus valley; being adjacent to a part of Lake Geneva belonging to the Canton of Geneva (but not to the municipality of Celigny) it is thus neither an exclave nor an enclave.

Do the lake parts of the canton belong to no municipality? According to the map, Céligny proper and the adjacent part of the lake do together form an exclave (but not an enclave because it has two neighbors: Vaud and France). —Tamfang (talk) 06:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is correct. No part of the lake belongs to any municipality of the cantons of Vaud, Valais, and Geneva. In Geneva this is also true of the rivers and underground waters: this is made clear in the constitution (art. 159) and in the cantonal law on water (art. 3.4 and 5.2). Sapphorain (talk) 07:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sapphorain, according to the map, the adjacent part of Lake Geneva is also unconnected to the main part of the Canton of Geneva. This makes the village of Céligny together with the adjacent part of lake a single exclave of the Canton of Geneva, so I think the article's wording is currently misleading. Rob984 (talk) 09:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks, you are right. I reworded one sentence.Sapphorain (talk) 11:47, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]