From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
WikiProject icon A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on September 26, 2013. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!

Proposed Deletion[edit]

This certainly should not be deleted. Dam-Funk has been written up in national/international, recognized publications (LA Weekly, The Guardian, Rolling Stones) and websites (Pitchfork, Fader, XLR8R). His releases are already having an wide influence (people are already biting his style) and he's done/doing collaborations with lots of acknowledged artists like Steve Arrington, Jody Whatley, Animal Collective, and so on. ASK ANYONE WHO'S BEEN MOST RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SUDDEN GROWING INTEREST IN BOOGIE-ERA FUNK AND THEY WILL TELL YOU DAM-FUNK. DO NOT DELETE THIS PAGE - EXPAND IT!

I agree with the above statement. This artist is growing in popularity both on the internet and through word-of-mouth. When I looked up this article I was surprised that it was only a mere stub. (talk) 11:41, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

I also generally oppose deletion of pages, even when people cite that it isnt that popular yet, but things get MORE popular with time. I'm just bitter because I'm dealing with this on another page. No, it should not be deleted. But it does need to be edited and I will begin that now. Any feedback or help will be appreciated.DaltonCastle (talk) 03:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

I just scratched the surface of cleaning up this page. It will be an arduous task...but I'll get it done.DaltonCastle (talk) 04:20, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Still lacks sources[edit]

Although the 2010 deletion discussion seemed to have uncovered some RS, they have not yet been added to this BLP. Miniapolis 21:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)